节点文献

诉源治理下农村土地仲裁制度程序理性的回归

Return of procedural rationality of rural land arbitration system under the governance of litigation source

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 黄茂醌

【Author】 HUANG Maokun;Law School, Yantai University;

【机构】 烟台大学法学院

【摘要】 农村土地承包经营纠纷仲裁制度因解纷机制平行化、仲裁委员会设置及构成行政化、仲裁裁决效力阙如等问题,导致农地纠纷化解的非彻底性,严重影响了农村基层社会秩序的稳定。诉源治理提倡将纠纷化解在源头,控制诉讼增量。应结合诉源治理的要求,实施仲裁前置制度,在此基础上理性认知农村土地纠纷的民事属性,适当弱化仲裁委员会设置的行政性、限制仲裁庭证据收集的强制权性、赋予裁决查明事实以争点效力,以此实现农村土地承包经营纠纷仲裁制度程序理性的回归。

【Abstract】 The arbitration system of rural land contract management disputes leads to the incompleteness of the resolution of rural land disputes and seriously affects the stability of rural grass-roots social order due to the parallelism of dispute resolution mechanism, the administrative setting and composition of arbitration committee, and the lack of effectiveness of arbitration award. Litigation source governance advocates resolving disputes at the source and controlling litigation increment. China should implement the pre arbitration system in combination with the requirements of litigation source governance. On this basis, we should rationally recognize the civil attribute of rural land disputes, appropriately weaken the administrative nature of the Arbitration Commission, limit the compulsory power of evidence collection of the arbitration tribunal, and endow the award with the effect of finding out the facts, so as to realize the return of procedural rationality of rural land contract management dispute arbitration system.

【基金】 重庆市社会科学规划项目(2019BS108)
  • 【文献出处】 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Social Sciences) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2021年05期
  • 【分类号】D925.7
  • 【下载频次】331
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络